Talk:Tingey House/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mr rnddude (talk · contribs) 15:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Hey there, I will be taking on the review of this article, expect a full review to be up by tomorrow. Mr rnddude (talk) 15:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

I will be using the above table to complete the review. Mr rnddude (talk) 15:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , I have completed my initial review of the article. I have made comments on the article in the sections I think could be improved. I would recommend ignoring my comments on 2d, 3a and 3b for the time being as they are more directed to me, this is because I am dealing with multiple GA reviews simultaneously. Thanks for your work on the article, it's an article that could be GA, just, not quite yet. Mr rnddude (talk) 13:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Mr rnddude thanks so much. I'll make these corrections within the next few days and ping you. I appreciate your time! LavaBaron| OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZED AS MOST POPULAR DYK EDITOR IN HISTORY 21:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , would I be correct in assuming that you've forgotten, pinging just to make sure. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Mr rnddude, LavaBaron posted at WT:DYK that he would be leaving Wikipedia "for an extended period" on the evening of September 2; his most recent post was 07:07 on September 3. I think you have to assume that, like the 11 DYK submissions that were withdrawn, this GA nomination has likewise been abandoned. Sorry for the bad news; it looks like the thing to do is to close the nomination as unsuccessful. He can always complete addressing the issues you raised and renominate the article after he returns. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I see, thanks for the heads up, I'll have this article failed in that case. LavaBaron feel free to renominate the article for GA when you've addressed the issues above. Cheers, Mr rnddude (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2016 (UTC)