Talk:Tips & Tricks

I am rather new to editing pages and I would appriciate it if someone would put some of the stuff after the bold heading into bullets. Greenday106 23:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

The magazine cover should be permitted as a fair use under the appropriate (C) license. I made the change to the image's license and re-added it. Bobak 23:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

are these pencil puzzles seen outside the magazine? I'm surprised no one has made a collection of these or come up with an easy way to generate these puzzles. it's difficult to find any info because "pencil puzzles" usually means something else when looking on google. maybe it goes by another name? 24.165.203.79 01:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:T&twindwaker.jpg
Image:T&twindwaker.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Um, hello....?
If the magazine is no longer published, why in the world does it still explain the depts. in the present tense? For example, it says one article is now on hiatus. Okay, that was true at the end of its run... what about now? If there is no way to get it back, isn't it gone forever? BTW, I would change this myself but I have to assume there's a reason it has remained this way for so long. Also, I feel this article directly contradicts itself anytime it refers to T&T's demise. They are not running anymore and are most likely not in the new Codebooks they sell instead. Tubularbells1993 (talk) 14:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It also would not be a bad idea to source some of this article's info. In fact, with the contradictory statements I pointed out above it almost must be done. Tubularbells1993 (talk) 14:38, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Redirecting
I'm fairly surprised at the lack of coverage this magazine received, but not overly so. Gaming magazines didn't start becoming mainstream until relatively recently and T&T was always one of the less popular ones out there. I've redirected it to the parent company, as they have a decent summary of the magazine. If anyone can find coverage in reliable sources, I'm all for unredirecting this. The only problem is that most of the coverage out there tends to be the non-usable type. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)