Talk:To Heart 2/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Demize (talk · contribs) 01:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: As the majority of the references used appear to be Japanese, this review will mostly look at the other aspects of the article. I'll try to be harder on them than I normally would, and I will also converse with the nominator about the references if I feel it's necessary. demize (t · c) 01:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

The Review
There were some issues that I discussed with Cloud668, the nominator and the major contributor to the article, on IRC (Rizon). Logs can be provided if anybody wants them.


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Good article overall.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * A lot of listing of things, but this is due to the content rather than the writing. Also, I ran AWB on this for genfixes/typos and none were found.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All the sources appear to be good: there are a couple well-known magazines; the publisher's and developer's websites; and Anime News Network, a well-known English source of information on the topics of Anime and Japanese Video games.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * While there could be more screenshots, they are not necessary and likely would not add much to the article.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I do believe that this article meets the Good Article standards. Congratulations! demize  (t · c) 03:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I do believe that this article meets the Good Article standards. Congratulations! demize  (t · c) 03:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review! --  クラ  ウド  ６６８  04:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)