Talk:To Kwa Wan station

Requested move 24 September 2017

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. bd2412 T 03:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Ma Tau Wai Station → To Kwa Wan Station – Per updated official name. The new name was the old name of the adjacent station during planning stage which is now renamed as Sung Wong Toi Station. Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 06:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose until officially confirmed by MTRC. If not confirmed when this discussion is closed, then move Sung Wong Toi Station back to To Kwa Wan Station. Jc86035 (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sung Wong Toi Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:46, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 27 November 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. This appears to be just a technical request with no need for discussion. I reverted an editor's c&p page move that had mucked things up a bit. Because of that, this discussion was listed at WP:RM as a malformed request. So I'll do a round-robin to bring the [ edit history] along with the rename. Happy Holidays to all! (closed by page mover)  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there 01:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Ma Tau Wai Station → To Kwa Wan Station – news confirmed the name.-- owennson （ Meeting Room 、 Certificates ） 10:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Official websites still use old names; move only if/when the websites are updated. Jc86035 (talk) 10:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC) Support since a press release has been issued. Jc86035 (talk) 09:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like no one cares about what you said in Sung Wong Toi/Kai Tak/Ho Man Tin Stations. Same in Chinese version.-- owennson （ Meeting Room 、 Certificates ） 10:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * That has no bearing on whether the article should actually be renamed or not. No one has edited Ho Man Tin Station yet so I'm confused as to why you're citing that as well. The article's already been renamed once and was then renamed back because the MTRC hadn't officially decided yet. I think we should change it after they can be bothered to confirm it by updating their own websites. (Also note that if the stations have been renamed they'll probably have updated the websites by the end of the 7-day period.) Jc86035 (talk) 10:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging previous RM participants: . Jc86035 (talk) 10:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Paragraph 22, for your reference.--HKM (talk) 11:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Official statement. --222.167.166.187 (talk) 04:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Please do that asap, this is officially confirmed. Chungonion (talk) 07:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Jc86035 (talk) 09:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hung Hom Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:00, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of the images and side bit
The side bit where all the statistics are and all the images are gone. I suspect that it might have been me, but all I did was put a and edit something that was very broad (The date) It said that a parameter was missing and I also saw that an editor was editing with me, but something went wrong. I do not know what went wrong. I believe there is a bug in the article.