Talk:To a Skylark

Improper tone
Wikipedia isn't a place to self-publish your English 101 essays —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicrawford (talk • contribs) 11:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I removed it as under the category of original research. Should it come back with cited analysis it should be accepted, but as it was it simply could have been an english paper written by anyone, riddled with weasel words. Gothmog1114 (talk) 03:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, I went ahead and tagged it to be cleaned up as I don't feel I've got enough knowledge on the subject to do it myself, nor am I really comfortable with just removing the entire section. Limacidae (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on To a Skylark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130305043103/http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/literature/id-245.html to http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/literature/id-245.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)