Talk:Tokyo DisneySea

Awards and credits
I removed most of a lengthy post that seems to list everybody involved in the project. It doesn't seem encyclopedic, and smacks of a copyvio. Moreover, the link supplied as a reference does not work, and I have been unable to find any corroboration. Trevor Hanson 17:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Ports of Call
The article currently lists both "Port Discovery" and "Mysterious Island" as the smallest ports of call at Tokyo DisneySea. It obviously can't be both, so which is it? --207.237.63.153 06:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

As far as actual 'area to walk', "Mysterious Island" is actually the smallest (although, by far, the most impressive). The article has been changed to reflect this. kayoss 17:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

References needed
I have just flagged this article with tags for primary references, OR and refimprove, It currently has only one reference, and even that is not from a primary third party source, it is from an industry publication which represents these kind of resorts. An article of this length should have many many citations given the amount of facts it contains. The article reads like a brochure, not an encyclopedia entry. A resort this size must have generated considerable press (both good and bad) and that should be incorporated into the text. There must be citations to verify the numerous claims made throughout the article. I stopped short of flagging them individually at this point, but if references aren't forthcoming then large parts of this article will have to be deleted and or reworded. Mfield (talk) 01:29, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Concept
Speaking of facts, I noticed this sentence- "By the time Tokyo DisneySea opened in 2001, its concepts and designs had been in development at Walt Disney Imagineering for well over 20 years." The truth is, Disney has a practice of 'borrowing' ideas from ex employees or "cast members" once they have left the company. Even if the Long Beach project had an association with Disney Seas at one point, Tokyo Disney Seas was a concept originated by an ex employee outside of imagineering dept.66.193.107.68 (talk) 20:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
This page (and a few related pages) seems to be the preferred target of a persistent vandal. There have been 34 edits since June 6th, all which are either vandalism or vandalism reverts, and based on the contents of the vandalism, it seems to be the same person, despite different IPv6 IP addresses. Is there anything that can be done to prevent or at least slow down this vandal? Scott Roy Atwood (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


 * You can request page protection here for the article. If you use Twinkle tools, it's in the TW pulldown menu as RPP; this one pops up a dialog box that makes it rather easy to file the request. As a word of caution, make sure you're on the actual page you want to request instead of its talk page (if you do it from talk, you'll be requesting protection for it instead of the article itself). -- McDoob  AU93  13:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)