Talk:Tom Bentley

Untitled
The page is in dire need of cleanup for POV. Pascal.Tesson 16:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Why? I can't see anything obviously biased or unencyclopaedic about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.236.165 (talk) 02:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

This is about tag cleanup. As all of the tags are more than a year old, there is no current discussion relating to them, and there is a great deal of editing done since the tags were placed, or perhaps there is a consensus on the discussion page, they will be removed. This is not a judgement of content. If there is cause to re-tag, then that of course may be done, with the necessary posting of a discussion as to why, and what improvements could be made. Do not undo this edit, but put a new tag and new comments so it will have a current date. This is only an effort to clean out old tags, and permit them to be updated with current issues if warranted.Jjdon (talk) 20:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Tom Bentley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/FE92B86A9DE270D7CA2577C9000CE893?OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)