Talk:Tom Kilburn/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Yoshi24517 (talk · contribs) 23:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello! I will be reviewing your article. Tagging

Per the guidelines at WP:WIAGA, 1. ✅
 * 1a. ✅ It is very clear and concise. Anyone who knows nothing about Tom Kilburn can find meaningful content on this page.
 * 1b. ✅ Great job! There are no problems with how the headers should be set up, as with WP:MOS.

2.
 * 2a. ✅ There are no blogs, or anything of the sort that is not verifiable.
 * 2b. ✅ Great job! They are all reliable sources.
 * 2c. ✅ There is no original research. Everything is linked to a reliable source.
 * 2d. ✅ Accoring to here, there is a little bit of a copyright violation, but that is a reliable source that is cited.

3. ✅
 * 3a. ✅ The article is very broad. The article does address the main aspects of the topic.
 * 3b. ✅ The does go a little into detail, but it is fine. (Nothing a little editing can't fix.)

4. ✅ Per WP:NPOV, there are no opinions or anything of that sort. 5. ✅ I have checked the edit history, and there are no edit wars going on. Great Job! 6. ✅ There are many images in the article. Extra Things to Correct: This is what I have reviewed. If you can fix those extra things, I will pass the article. Thanks! Yoshi24517 Chat Online 23:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Please expand the lead, as per WP:LEAD.
 * 2) Please make the spelling of words so that they follow British or American spelling.

This article has 9,585 characters readable prose, so per WP:LEADLENGTH, it should have a lead of one or two paragraphs. I have doubled it in length to two paragraphs. I have run a spelling check on the article, and I think we have corrected all the spelling errors. Hope this addresses all the issues. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm a little busy, so I won't be able to pass the article until tomorrow. I'll check for anything else that need fixing. Yoshi24517 Chat  Online 05:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I found the quote you put near the bottom of the article. Please put quotations marks on the quote that the article has. Thanks! Yoshi24517 Chat  Online 22:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Per MOS:BLOCKQUOTE: Do not enclose block quotations in quotation marks Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh whoops! Sorry, didn't read that. Overall: ✅. Yoshi24517 Chat  Online 04:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Pinging: Congratulations!