Talk:Tom Quirk

Notability?
Is there any argument for the subject being WP:NOTABLE? Nearly all the cites sources are publication by him. As far as I can tell, there is nothing about him. Even the IPA page has no substantial information (and would not, in general, be accepted as a RS). There is a short and very unspecific author blurb in the CEDA brochure, but that again is not a RS. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 16:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I think you have a point okay. there seems to be no interest in him from a secondary source and he doesn't seem to satisfy any notability criterion. Dmcq (talk) 17:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm on the fence. He's arguably notable as a corporate director. But if even DGG thinks he might not be notable, then he's probably not notable. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The basic criterion for notability of people is "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." I can't see a single secondary source talking about him in the article. Do his books even have independent reviews that mention something about him? Dmcq (talk) 15:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Tom Quirk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://sementis.com/index.php/company/the-executive-team

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)