Talk:Tom Zakrajsek

Wikipedia is not a place for self-advertisement...
I believe that the edit to the "Coaching Style" section on 9/10/11 is a more accurate and more properly-sourced version than the one the was there previously, and should remain a part of the article. What was there previously both lacked proper sourcing and fell more into the realm of advertisement for the article's subject's "coaching style."

Azrielen (talk) 19:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Coaching style
I have removed this section. I read the section and the sources, and the material most critical of Zakrajsek is simply not supported by the sources. Material that leads to those assertions (an injury) is supported, but that isn't what matters. The section is criticizing the subject, which, if not well-supported, constitutes a BLP violation. The material should not be reinserted without discussion here.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2011 (UTC)