Talk:Tomahawk (geometry)

Proof
How about an actual proof that this tomahawk actually trisects angles ?

How about a proof that if positioned correctly(and how it must be positioned) it will trisect an angle ?

How about an explanation of why translating that is not an euclidean construction ?

All of these lack to get a coherent good rigorous article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.26.49.179 (talk) 11:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Suggested Changes
The "Tomahawk" (as mentioned in the references) is a geometric "implement" or "tool" rather than a geometric "shape".

The title and the content should be changed appropriately.

OK!
I really enjoyed this! Congratulations on our DYK! Amandajm (talk) 11:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Ratings Template
I'm rating this article as low priority. Congrats on the DYK! Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)