Talk:Tomasz Misiak

Possible Defamation Case
Dear Wikipedia Editors, I am writing from Poland to express concerns regarding the Wikipedia page associated with Mr. Misiak. It has come to my attention that the content currently published may be significantly influenced by individuals openly in conflict with Mr. Misiak. I suspect that the contributions might even be coordinated with or influenced by Mr. Misiak's wife. The information, as it stands, appears to be predominantly inaccurate or misleading. I had previously made edits to this page, aiming to correct the misrepresented facts with information supported by public sources. Unfortunately, my changes were reverted, which I believe undermines the integrity and purpose of Wikipedia as a platform for factual and unbiased information. In light of this, I respectfully suggest a reevaluation of the edits I submitted last month. The objective is to ensure that the page reflects accurate information and does not serve as a medium for defamation. Upholding the principles of veracity and neutrality is paramount, and I trust that the Wikipedia community shares these values. Thank you for considering my recommendation and for your ongoing commitment to maintaining the reliability of Wikipedia. Sincerely, Greg GrzegorzNews (talk) 21:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Question for administrator
I have observed that there appears to be an individual actively engaged in modifying published information, removing verified details, and participating in actions that could be construed as defamation, seemingly at the behest of another party. This activity not only undermines the integrity of the information but also potentially harms the reputation of individuals or entities through the dissemination of untruths. I believe it is crucial to address this behavior promptly and ensure that all published information remains accurate, factual, and free from malicious tampering. I urge the relevant authorities or platforms to investigate these alterations thoroughly and take appropriate measures to rectify any inaccuracies and prevent further instances of such conduct — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrzegorzNews (talk • contribs)
 * Wikipedia has no central authority to address grievances. Admins like me have no more authority than any other editor, just additional tools. Do you have a particular interest in regards to this subject? Please discuss your specific grievances here.
 * Accusations of a conspiracy are serious, and require serious evidence. Please give your evidence(which is not just disagreement with your edits); if off wiki information is involved, you will need to communicate it to a checkuser privately, see WP:CHECKUSER. 331dot (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The information you are attempting to add is poorly written and questionably sourced. Please discuss this here before editing. 331dot (talk) 19:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * My opinion on this matter stems from the structure of the material in the English version, which is completely different from the Polish version. It can be considered manipulated.
 * == Examples==
 * 1. The section regarding leaving politics includes false media information for which, in a later period, these media outlets apologized following court decisions on the violation of personal rights; this information is absent in the English version.
 * https://wiadomosci.dziennik.pl/polityka/artykuly/154995,afery-senatora-misiaka-nie-bylo.html
 * https://archive.is/20120905142506/http://www.misiak.org/media.html
 * Information about the visa tender contains false suggestions published by media involved on the side of one of the companies participating in the tender. The tender was ultimately settled in public procurement arbitration, did not raise any controversies, nor was it non-transparent. Suggesting connections with Russian intelligence in the biography of a living person based on the publication of a niche newspaper is a strong deviation from Wikipedia's principles. The material in WP.PL, one of the largest Polish internet portals, describes unethical practices of one of the parties in this procedure. Despite this, the text remains present in the biography.
 * https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/wszystkie-chwyty-dozwolone-ostra-walka-o-obsluge-ukraincow-i-gore-pieniedzy-6693338645912224a
 * The material concerning the arrest and charges does not include that the court of first instance determined that it saw no crime in the cases of Mr. Witucki and Mr. Misiak. It also lacks information that this matter became an element of the appeal of several non-governmental organizations and numerous authorities led by Lech Walesa, as an example of so-called malicious political investigations conducted by the undemocratic government of PiS. The Minister of Justice committed to reviewing these cases. The detention of Maciej Witucki and Tomasz Misiak was considered a scandal and an attempt to intimidate business circles by the business community. Maciej Witucki was detained during Poland's largest economic conference, EFNI, of which he was the main organizer.
 * https://cornerstone-im.com/news/an-appeal-for-a-review-of-politically-motivated-prosecutorial-proceedings-in-20152023-and-the-rehabilitation-of-the-victims
 * https://en.odfoundation.eu/content/uploads/2023/10/2023.10-odf-malicious-prosecution-report-v01.pdf page 58
 * https://en.odfoundation.eu/a/725327,bodnars-open-letter-to-walesa-on-investigations-from-pis-days/ GrzegorzNews (talk) 22:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)