Talk:Tomb of Tutankhamun/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Merytat3n (talk · contribs) 10:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

I will review this over the next few days :) Merytat3n (talk) 10:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Thank you for the opportunity to review this article! Merytat3n (talk) 10:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Very well written and formatted
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Well-referenced with appropriate sources. Checked some citations of sources I have to hand - pages are correct etc. Earwig yields maximum of 13.8% which is totally fine - only so many ways to word things. Googling random phrases just returns this wiki page
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Well-focused and useful. No obvious gaps
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Balanced
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * stable, no edit warring
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Illustrated. Many images are appropriate given the contents are what the tomb is famous for
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Very well done!!! Thank you for all your hard work, it shows