Talk:Tommy McClelland

NPOV
The edit you keep trying to restore, does not seem especially neutral or to be very reliable. It's sourced solely to a Youtube video of the subject talking, and makes claims not shown anywhere in the video. It seems to be making an unsupported claim about what happened after it was uploaded. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 09:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @Frank042316, You say you've added an appropriate source, but there's still a problem of the section being original analysis. "quickly became seen as an infamous", "not only rejected but also went on to insult", "by extension" are some of the assertions that just aren't supported here. At minimum, everything after the citation is original research. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 13:50, 30 July 2023 (UTC)