Talk:Tommy Tallarico/vfd

from VfD:


 * anons are not allowed to nominate VfD.   &mdash; Kieff | Talk 04:30, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

nothing personal. a bit of a vanity/promotion page. no encyclopedic value whatsoever, considering more accomplished musicians such as jeremy soule and bill brown do not exist on wikipedia. suggesting for deletion.

142.32.208.233 22:37, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)Freeper, 12/14/2004 5:37 P.M.


 * Keep. His accomplishments are certainly notable. - Lucky 6.9 22:43, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Looks reasonably notable to me, Keep. --fvw *  22:43, 2004 Dec 14 (UTC)


 * Delete. no, he hasn't worked on over two hundred titles. his company and/or his subcontactors have worked on over two hundred titles. -> ''note: this anon is the same person who suggested the deletion. Anons are not allowed to vote either, disconsider this vote.   &mdash; Kieff | Talk 04:30, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. No one listens to the music on video games, except for those few high school choir and band geeks who figured out the background tunes from Super Mario Brothers. &mdash;ExplorerCDT 22:55, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Excuse me, but were you trying to make a point here?   &mdash; Kieff | Talk 04:13, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. One of the most notable non-Japanese video game musicians. The fact that we don't yet have articles on Jeremy Soule and Bill Brown (musician) is not a valid reason to delete this article.  --Mrwojo 23:19, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Strong keep and very weak reasoning for the original VfD proposal. This person is clearly notable in his field. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 23:35, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've actually heard of him, go figure. &mdash;tregoweth 00:08, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. Chockers with encyclopaedic value. If Wikipedia lacks articles on other guys in that field, you're free to write them. Dr Zen 00:56, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. If "jeremy soule and bill brown" had articles written about them that were deleted, it might be grounds to delete this. As it stands, they just have never had articles written about them, which is reason to write articles about them, not delete other articles. This article clearly stands on its own merits as deserving to be kept. Shane King 01:18, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete: A crafstman. Not notable individually.  Geogre 02:12, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. Some stuff do sound like promotion, but I can't verify them. If it had sources, maybe this wouldn't be an issue. But anyway, he is notable, and we should have an article about him, just like we also should have about Soule and Brown. Btw, are anons allowed to VFD?   &mdash; Kieff | Talk 04:06, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)


 * Invalid VfD, nominated by anon. Keep when the page is legally nominated. Alphax (talk) 04:44, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Could someone please tell me where it says that anons can't make VFD nominations. Thanks Paul August &#9742; 05:06, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)


 * Comment: If this is an invalid nomination, why is it still here? &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 07:02, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Extreme keep, by the way. &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 09:28, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion