Talk:Tommy Thumb's Song Book

The introduction of the article seems to be biased and not backed up by a source. The author seems to be making a claim about the book that is not fact or well founded in sources. For example, author says that the books are still "well known" but i'm not sure how that is. Further, the sources that are available are extremely limited (there are only two, and in fact seem very biased themselves. The content section is very limited and could use some expansion. The article does not seem to be fully developed and only skims the surface of this topic. The viewpoint that this book is still well known and important seems to be very overrepresented and not backed up with viable sources. I would suggest that the author do some more in depth research on the topic and remove some of his opinions on the relevance and popularity of the book. I think the article could also benefit from a more extensive and varied body of sources. Sierrawesthem (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)