Talk:Tooh (song)

Track list
Can you explain to me why the track list of whole film is needed here? How does the position of other songs besides this song in a CD matter? §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 14:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I was just going to do that.  Soham  14:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I am willing to discuss about the CD version not the digital single one.  Soham  14:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The song was released twice, once digitally as a single through iTunes India and other in CD version with the rest of the tracks. The track being released twice we have to mention both instances, not one. In case of CD version just mentioning the track no. won't suffice. Track is only justified when its relative, eg: This is one, this is two. That would make sense while "This is four" simply put will not make sense. There you go Dharma.  Soham  15:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay! So hows this.... "The song was digitally released on DDMMYY on iTunes and then again released in CD format, along with the whole sound track of the film on DDMMYY." I really don't understand why and how does it matter to say that the song is 4th in the CD or 7th. I have seen such numbering to matter for songs of Western albums. Maybe outside wiki the number matters to these western albums. But how does it matter to this filmy song? Who really cares for that number? And just to establish that number, we have to add list of all songs. If at all you want to mention other songs of the film, mention other hit ones like "Chingam Chabake" in the prose. More pointers coming later on for addition to the article. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 15:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh Dharma! Thanks, I already have a draft for the song ready here.  Soham  15:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * As a side note the GAR was just hell! The reviewer asked me to include the track listing for CD Version, I did and it broke my back while reading out those small piece of letters on the CD release notes and now you have provided an absolutely justified reason to omit. Damn, all those minutes wasted! But the GAR was a real learning curve for me though!  Soham  15:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Why do you blindly listen to reviewers? WP:FILMPLOT not only applies for film's plot section but it equally applies for TV show's plot section, book's story or song's video. It isn't explicitly written such because essay writers expect you be capable of that much brain function. The essence is that what description of the video you get by actually keeping your eyes open while the video is on doesn't need other secondary references. Commentary on it would require sec sources. If they aren't reasonably educated person they can't be WP:COMPETENT either to review articles of songs which they are puzzled at the end about. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 16:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The man got irritated when I left a message on his talk, imagine the condition of the review if I opposed to him. I steer clear of broils. He was not ready to listen, what can I do then? Articles are not created as GA quality ones, they are the result of combined effort of both the contributor and the reviewer, as they say in Bengali, "Joda hathe tali baje na" meaning it has to be give and take not a one-sided affair. After all were here to build to encyclopaedia together. At one point I thought it to be a FA review. His ending note that said and I quote "the nominator not being capable of addressing these issues without a third party to assist" was extremely disappointing and deterring. The review, only my second bit me like hell! There is no point in discussing it now and I don't want to engage in a dispute with him, will do no favours to my mental health which has taken a bashing in the last few weeks. I will list it for WP:GOCE again and lets see if its GA worthy then. Thanks for your support Dharma.

Note: C799 I have no hard feelings against you, just that I was disappointed with the review please don't take the above as a WP:PA as I am expressing my disappointment about your review [work] and not lambasting at you. We both have our POV's and I respect yours, please respect mine. Thanks.  Soham  16:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)