Talk:Top Model (Scandinavian TV series)

Comments
The majority of information in this post is incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.42.15 (talk • contribs) 2006-11-23
 * Could you state what, specifically, is wrong? --Oldak Quill 23:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

There is a mistake in the judges section, it sais Mariana Herkerk, but her name is Mariana Verkerk, I dont know if she changed her (Dutch) name to make it easyer to pronounce... Juudt (talk) 17:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Which table should be used in the article?
I'm trying to reach consensus over which table should be used in the main article. The first, smaller table, includes only the finalists of the merged version. The second includes finalists from the merged version as well as the national finalists of each branch during the cycle. It would be very appreciated if other users would put their imput into this discussion. For the record, I choose Table B. My logic is that while I agree that tables should be kept consistent to each other, the format of this show itself was vastly different from most other versions. That in itself demands that information be presented differently for a better understanding of the show. It's a bit more information yes, but the presentation of the table (airtade, cycle, winner, runner-up, contestants, number of contestants, destination) is exactly the same. The addition of all the contestants in no way takes away from the validity or accuracy of the information.

2601:241:0:EA46:78D4:88EE:F3A6:47A1 (talk) 18:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

This is Table B

 * A is more consistent with the format of the other tables, and it includes only the finalists, while B includes the contestants of the individual competitions, which are classified as semi-finalists. Also, B disrupts the page format, as it stretches it a lot, and I feel it could be hard to manage when the new cycle begins, as we don't know whether it will follow the same format as cycles 1–3 or not. Linguist 111 talk 18:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * That is why the new cycle section for new contestants has been ammended to cover for that. If that were the case, if the show were to follow a more standard format (like Asia's Next Top Model) the new table would look like this, and the difference would be explained in the format section of the article. 2601:241:0:EA46:78D4:88EE:F3A6:47A1 (talk) 18:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * {| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%; text-align: center;"

! rowspan="2" |Cycle ! rowspan="2" |Premiere ! rowspan="2" |Winner ! rowspan="2" |Runners-up ! colspan="4" |Other contestants in order of elimination ! rowspan="2" |Number of contestants ! rowspan="2" |Destination !National finalists !🇩🇰 Denmark !🇳🇴 Norway !🇸🇪 Sweden !1 !2 !3 !1
 * 🇩🇰 February 15, 2005 🇸🇪 February 16, 2005 🇳🇴 February 17, 2005
 * 🇳🇴 Kine Bakke
 * 🇸🇪 Elina Herbeck 🇩🇰 Nanna Schultz Christensen
 * 🇩🇰 Stine Mangaard Hansen 🇸🇪 Madelene Lund & 🇳🇴 Kristin Rem Trehjørningen 🇸🇪 Maja Ekberg & 🇳🇴 Henriette Stenbeck & 🇩🇰 Cecilie Madsen
 * Malene von der Maase Amirah Hamed Alsarrag Sophie Tine Schandorff Helga Rose Anne Baunbæk Pedersen Stéphanie Juana Rasmussen
 * Anne Hauge Amila Vuckic Warsan Adam Anna Kolaczkowska Tina Nordby Marna Haugen
 * Paula Quiroga Maria Öhrstrand (quit) Heléne Melin Maria Lager Kumba M'bye Louise Willenheimer Julia Krischel
 * 28
 * 🇺🇸 New York
 * -style="background: #D0E6FF;"
 * 🇳🇴 September 5, 2005 🇩🇰 September 6, 2005 🇸🇪 September 14, 2005
 * 🇳🇴 Frøydis Elvenes
 * 🇩🇰 Anna Nørgaard 🇸🇪 Arwen Bergström
 * 🇸🇪 Mikaela Källgren & 🇩🇰 Louise Falkenblad & 🇳🇴 Karin Santini 🇩🇰 Tine Holm Riis & 🇳🇴 Kristine Øverby & 🇸🇪 Janni Juntunen
 * Mikaela K. Ibsen Tanja Johnsen Line Bang Sofie Thrane Heidi Helm Larsen Lise M. Andersen
 * Nazila Shirindel Annette Kjær Nora Møller Elise Måge Sarah Mohamud Sandra Otteraaen
 * Fahrie Berisha Charlotte Treschow Anna Maria Moström Jazzmine Berger Maria Lindgren Emelie Törnqvist
 * 27
 * 🇫🇷 Paris
 * {{nowrap|🇩🇰 {{start date|2006|2|14}} {{nowrap|🇳🇴 {{start date|2006|2|27}}}} {{nowrap|🇸🇪 {{start date|2006|3|8}}}}
 * {{nowrap|🇸🇪 Freja Kjellberg Borchies}}
 * {{nowrap|🇩🇰 Anna Brændstrup}} {{nowrap|🇳🇴 Therese Haugsnes}}
 * {{nowrap|🇩🇰 Sara Olsen}} & {{nowrap|🇳🇴 Cathrine Wenger}} {{nowrap|🇸🇪 Florina Weisz}} {{nowrap|🇸🇪 Sabina Karlsson}} & {{nowrap|🇳🇴 Mira Aanes Wolden}} & {{nowrap|🇩🇰 Camilla Schønberg}}
 * Mira Pelle Cecilia Kristensen Stine Palle Nana Bach Nielsen Line Vanggaard Nielsen Christina Anaya Mortensen Signe Cecilie Nørgaard
 * Ingrid Janne Sæberg Rikke Kalsveen Helene Sletten Vangen Ellen Caroline Brenger (quit) Kira Hellsten Camilla Abry
 * Sandra Nilsson Joanna Häggblom Ebba Söderström Emma Johansson Julia Agapova Sofia Eriksson Kristina Svensson
 * 29
 * 🇮🇹 Milan
 * -style="background: #D0E6FF;"
 * September 22, 2010
 * 🇩🇰 Caroline Bader
 * 🇳🇴 Brinette Odgaard
 * colspan="4"|Sofia Sakko, Astrid Bech Augustinussen, Serina Jensen, Emma Penthien, Nanna Jo Borgersen, Elise Lou Dubois, Rochel Rasmusen, Laila McFarlan, Isabella Kaufmann, Stephanie Strarup & Karen Ziefeldt
 * 13
 * 🇫🇷 Paris {{flagicon|UK}} London
 * }


 * A I think it's good like it is now. Table B is to big and stretched. To much squeezed in one Table. DDKay (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Table B I like B because it contains more information. I always consider more information to be better inasmuch as people looking up such information have everything they need presented to them with fewer clicks. No point in making people scroll or click when you can present them with the information they want right there. Damotclese (talk) 15:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Leaning towards B (Summoned by feedback request service) Yes, it looks huge & unwieldy, but it doesn't seem to me that every possible contestant along the way is crufty information or too much detail. I suppose this is just the lesser of two evils; I might prefer something else if another alternative were presented. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 20:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 *  Then may I propose this This last table has all of the information of the larger table (B), but the subsection is collapsible so that it does not take up as much room. This way, the table in place remains intact, but the rest of information is still made available. I've left the new table on the main page so we can get a better understanding of how much space it would take up. 2601:241:0:EA46:112:272F:30F2:AA0D (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Looks good! It's fine by me. Linguist 111 talk 12:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Table C (expandable proposal). A is missing info; B is too wide. --A D Monroe III (talk) 12:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC) (via feedback request service)