Talk:Topgrading

Contested deletion
How is a page deleted when it's not actually an article yet? In additional, what is being advertised in the article? Please read the article and the references. I read your rules on tone and referencing and believe that I followed them 100%. Not sure why there is so much want to delete an article about this term.

Neutrality?
This reads like an advertisement. Where's the section on controversies, of which this method has plenty? 97.113.132.31 (talk) 19:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Addendum (same user, I just hadn't logged in when I wrote the above): all your references appear to be either written by the developers of the Topgrading method or by blatant enthusiasts for it. That is not an effective way to get neutral, encyclopedia-appropriate information. I would expect there to be at least a few key sources which oppose this controversial system, and ideally the core of the article would be taken from sources which have no opinion and are simply reporting, if such can be obtained. But to use nothing but such blatantly preferential sources is inherently biased reporting. Quibbitzer (talk) 19:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)