Talk:Tornado Low Level/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 18:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Looks interesting. Happy to offer a review. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The non-free images have incomplete rationales. Do we need both? I wonder if just the gameplay image would be sufficient?
 * It would be weird to have a game article not have anything like a title screen or boxart. Also I filled the rationales. GamerPro64  00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * "GamesTM declared that, despite stating flaws in the game, said it stood the test of time." This sentence is a bit all over the place!
 * I removed the source. It did not add much overall. GamerPro64  00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Why not incorporate the Your Spectrum external link as a reference?
 * Added it as reference. GamerPro64  00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * What's the value of the other two external links? If they're reliable sources, perhaps incorporate them, and, if not, perhaps remove them?
 * Fits in line with the Manual of Style. GamerPro64  00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok - could you explain what they are adding? If they're reliable sources, perhaps you could add them as full references in a further reading section? I think I would prefer that to external links. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't believe they are considered reliable sources. I can replace them with a Mobygames link instead. GamerPro64  12:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Category:Multidirectional shooters? Category:Combat flight simulators (or Category:Flight simulation video games)? Is it worth creating a Vortex Software category?
 * I think the first one. Also might be worth making a Vortex category. Might do that later. GamerPro64  00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could mention more explicitly that this was developed in the UK?
 * Done. GamerPro64  00:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Other than that, this looks great from a first read through. The prose is maybe a little choppy, but of GA-standard, as far as I'm concerned. Please double-check my edits. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm now happy with the external links, and I think the image switch was a good move. Happy to promote. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)