Talk:Torreón massacre/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ceradon (talk · contribs) 02:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Addressing the issues
Okay, here goes: I think the problem has generally been fixed. Immigration began in the 17th century, but they didn't arrive in Torreón specifically until the late 1800s. Since it was unclear, I added a line to clarify.  Added a line clarifying why this is thought. Thanks, not sure why I included the WP:SCAREQUOTES. Removed ✅ I disagree that this is stating the same thing twice. The first sentence illustrates the violence with which the victims were killed, the second sentence is about the desecration of the bodies once dead. According to the "snippet views" of unavailable pages from the Romero source, it would appear that the estimate was made during Wilfley & Bassett's investigation. However, I'm not sure if I feel comfortable citing this since I can't view the whole text. Thoughts? ✅: Fixed, see &. I also added inflation as you suggested. Fixed. Clarified. Fixed. I have removed the quotation marks. Not done, per Manual of Style/Linking (and WP:ANCHOR, which I presume was the link you intended) anchors are useful if the section title is ever changed, to prevent broken section links. Since a section title has previously been changed in this article, and conceivably could be again in the future, I'm going to leave the anchors. The "12 Spaniards and a German" statement is also verified by the East Oregonian source, while the "several Americans" is not. That's why I chose to include one but not the other. The copyright information from the first page of the book credits it as UCambridge 1986, so I used that. I didn't include the location in those citations because it wasn't given as part of the bibliographic information in the book, however, I suppose the location is almost certainly that of the presses, so added. The incidents' relationship to the Torreón massacre was considered significant enough to be included by the authors of the references, so I would be inclined to leave it per WP:DUE. I made to provide the proper credit, per what was available on the original source's information page. However, if this is not sufficient, I could always tag it with author instead. I can't find anything in WP:CAPTION that forbids the use of center to increase the aesthetic value of the captions. However, if there is, I wouldn't object to removing them.
 * Immigrants
 * 17th century
 * Probably
 * "Chinese gardens"
 * general→General
 * The mob finally reached the bank...
 * "Estimated that the dead"
 * 308 people
 * 2015 or 1911
 * a plan which never played out
 * Owang King and Antonio Ramos Pedrueza
 * Independence Day
 * Bloquotes
 * Anchors
 * Spokane Review
 * Publication information discrepancy
 * Location parameter
 * Further unrest
 * Hai Chi
 * Captions


 * It would seem that all the issues I alluded too have been addressed. Good work, . --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 02:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

I hope that addresses all of it,. Thanks for the review! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 20:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)