Talk:Torrijos–Carter Treaties/Archive 1

Untitled
Why did the US agree to do this? - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  20:48, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * Colonialism was out of favour by the end of the 20th Century, and self-determination was becoming an important global movement. The United States was no longer in a position to insist on maintaining ownership of a facility that was within the borders of another country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newzild (talk • contribs) 21:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Sabotage attempt
Since this is discussed in Torrijos' article could we just link to it? CSTAR 23:24, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I don't object. I thought that it gives an insight into Torrijos' fierce nationalism, though. --Herschelkrustofsky 02:07, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

BTW, I found an alternate (I hesitate to say more credible, helas -- the Chicago Tribune. Aug 12, 1990). For copyright reasons, I won't insert here the complete Trib article. This is the gyst of the article:

 According to confiscated documents, Torrijos asked Noriega to draw up plans to sabotage the Panama Canal and attack U.S. military headquarters to insure ratification of the Canal Treaties. Noriega's notes on the plan were found during the 1989 invasion. In August 1990, when the article was written, the files were being held in a warehouse in Corozal, Panama guarded by the U.S. Army.

Apparently portions of the plan were published in the September 1990 issue of New York-based Details magaizine (never heard of it)

A note in Noriega's handwriting referred to the plan called "Huele A Quemado"; it called for a series of commando units to attack and sabotage the targets. In the Tribune report, it said that acording to Details magazine the plan was continually updated, even after Noriega became head of the PDF. One unit was to attack the lock gates, another the canal locomotives which pulled the ships through the locks.

A document marked "SECRETO" said "Mission: Make inoperable the Panama Canal and areas of defense of same,"

I think that part of the article should be rewritten. For copyright reasons, we also may have to delete this part of the talk page.CSTAR 03:12, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)