Talk:Toscana (film)

This article is more like a piece of fluff than its judgment of the film is
The 'reviewer(s?)' repeat the same negative points of view, showing more than a hint of bias.

There is no plot summary.

If this is the standard of Wikipedia articles they deserve a collective 1 star rating.

If the review were quite a lot funnier it would almost constitute a joke. 2.100.81.59 (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You may write the plot summary yourself—that's the point of Wikipedia.  —Biscuit-in-Chief :-)  (/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/) 06:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I have no reason to doubt that the Danish reviewers only want this film to do well. They just didn't like it that much. And there's nothing wrong in that being reflected in this article.  —Biscuit-in-Chief :-)  (/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/) 10:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * A balance of views might better suit Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:1541:B21F:1:2:F641:C6B (talk) 17:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * What balance of views should be introduced when basically all the critics say the same things? Only one very short review was slightly positive, and that's written about in the "Critical response" section.  —Biscuit-in-Chief :-)  (/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/) 20:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I presume that you forgot to cite your sources for 'basically all" and "only one". Otherwise your comment is merely unsubstantiated opinion.