Talk:Touch of My Hand/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 20:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Lead

 * Balewa Muhammad, and Sheppard Solomon → comma is superfluous here
 * and produced by Harry and Solomon → while production was handled by Harry and Solomon (word rep.)
 * contemporary critics → link to Music journalism

Infobox

 * November 12, 2003 (album) → November 12, 2003 (via album)
 * As a writer, please only state "Spears" and not her full name
 * "Trip hop" is not sourced in the article, so remove it

Background

 * Spears previewed the song to Quddus Philippe → state "The singer" here for alternation
 * I really love the vibe of "Touch of My Hand." → I really love the vibe of 'Touch of My Hand'.

Composition

 * Unlink Britney Spears here and only state her last name
 * link the two genres
 * "out of control." → " before full stop
 * The lyrics of the song are about the act of masturbation: → As aforementioned, the lyrics are about the act of masturbation (unlink):
 * The song received many comparisons to the work of Madonna. → Shouldn't you merge this into "Reception"?
 * "nearly eight-minute trance remix," → " before comma

Reception

 * contemporary music critics → link to Music journalism
 * Ruth Mitchell of BBC Music called the song → Use "track" here for alternation
 * club sound of "Vogue"-era → club sound of 'Vogue'-era

Live performances

 * from the "Toxic" → from her "Toxic" (2003)
 * You don't need three paragraphs here; you can combine all of them if you want to
 * You can add an image here from one of her controversial performances

Credits and personnel

 * Unlink the album

Copy-violation

 * 62.5% is too much! Please look at the first source and try to reword it.

Sample

 * Sample seems stable.

Links

 * No problems here!

Outcome

 * for 7 days! Good luck with editing, Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Could you allow me additional time for work on this article. There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding whether or not this article is notable. I would like to gain a clear consensus of this article's future before making these changes to it. Regards, Carbrera (talk) 01:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC).
 * I apologize for interrupting this review, but I would suggest failing this until the notability of the article is established. If the article is established as notable, then it can be revised and nominated again for GAN. How does that sound ? It seems that it will take more time a clear consensus to be reached about this article's future. Aoba47 (talk) 17:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Failing this per suggestion. As aforementioned, if the article is going to be kept, you can renominate. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)