Talk:Toussaint Louverture/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk · contribs) 15:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm happy to review this article.

Initial thoughts: there are three apparently valid citation needed tags, and several other uncited claims including a quote from Henri Christophe. These all need fixing if the article is to read Good Article status. There are also many citations to James 1814: is such a dated source reliable? And several to James without any date given: are these to James 1814 or James 1934? And in either case is that a reliable source? Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * As the nominator has not been active for over a month and there has been no engagement with this review in a week, I am going to fail it now. Anyone who wants to bring the article up to GA would be well advised to fix the sourcing issues before renominating. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 16:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)