Talk:Toys "R" Us Canada

Difficult case
, I see why you originally moved this to draftspace. Part of me is unsure why this needs to be separate from the larger article on Toys R Us. However, since the larger chain has collapsed and the Canadian business is still intact, does that provide an interesting case for corporate notability separately? , what are your thoughts? (Not on the choice by the original editor to bypass AfC, but on the notability question) Bkissin (talk) 17:47, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I have no opinion on notability, but it needs sources to be in mainspace. buidhe 17:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * User:Bkissin - My opinion is that this is a case where notability in article space should be decided by a deletion discussion, rather than by draftifying. I am aware that I am in something of a minority in that many editors think that AFD should be avoided at all costs, even by move-warring things into draft space.  However, my opinion is that Toys "R" Us Canada should go into article space, and a deletion discussion can be held.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Consider to merge with Toys "R" Us.

The9Man &#124; (talk) 09:15, 29 February 2020 (UTC)