Talk:Trabancos (river)/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.


 * The lead is too short to adequately summarise the article.


 * There is some translation required in the References section, for instance: "Pages 733 y cuadro 3".


 * Non-English sources should be flagged with the language they're written in.


 * There is only one citation in the ZEPA designation section, right at the start. Does that source all of the information in that section? If so, it should be placed at the end.


 * The Trabancos River today is too short for a subsection. Is there nothing else to say about it?


 * The three images at the end of the ZEPA designation secrion should either be integrated into the body of the text or removed.


 * References and notes should be tidied up so as to avoid the need to repeat the same sources. I'd suggest separating it into Notes and Bibliography, with the book details in Bibliography and references to particular pages in Notes.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 18:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * As these issues remain outstanding, this article has now been delisted. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 13:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)