Talk:Trace amine-associated receptor

Untitled
'

New review
It's probably worth using this review to add new content to phenethylamine, 3-iodothyronamine, trace amine, TAAR1, TAAR2, TAAR5, TAAR6, TAAR8, and this article.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢) 02:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Human trace amine-associated receptors
do you think the content within and layout of this table is suitable for covering these receptors in the article?

Also, do you think it's reasonable to just list "known/putative functions" and "known ligands" as well as explicitly state "other G protein coupling unknown" for these receptors when so few things are actually known about hTAAR2-hTAAR9?  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢) 22:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * E.g., this review lists "CNS and periphery unknown" under the associated putative functions column in table 1 for all of these receptors, except for TAAR1. Off-topic: I emailed Dr. Berry and he was kind enough to multi-license figure 2 from this review so that I could upload it to Commons and use it in TAAR1.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢) 22:36, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Seppi333. The lack knowledge about what these receptor subtypes do is of course a direct consequence of a lack of selective ligands to probe their function.  The way you have presented this in the table I think is fine.  The only suggestion I have is to make clear which of the functions are known and which are putative. Also I found the pink color for pseudogenes distracting and unnecessary.  It is clear enough from the text that these are pseudogenes. Boghog (talk) 05:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Removing the coloring is fine with me. Thanks for the feedback!  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢) 05:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)