Talk:Tracey Cox

Expert?
I'm intrigued how someone divorced can claim to be - or regarded as - an expert in relatioinships. Either she failed to make her marriage work or married a complete no-hoper. Either way, hardly firm evidence of expertise in this specific area, is it? Just a thought.. 82.110.109.212 10:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Re the above, my thought is perhaps it helps to have gone through a divorce to learn more? Anyway, she can't live in both Richmond and Notting Hill, so this article needs work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.206.64 (talk) 18:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Expert or not, she's HOT!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.38.11.93 (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Divorce is now so commonplace and entered into with such varying circumstances and motives, I think marital status is neither here nor there with regard to a person's claim to being a relationship expert. Perhaps it is rather the way the words 'relationship expert' are used and how you define 'expert' that is the ground for criticism. It is no doubt part of her life experience, experience should inform expertise. Are we to consider relationship experts genuine only if they managed to stay married to one person throughout life - like Ruth Westheimer and Claire Rayner?Cloptonson (talk) 06:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Qualifications?
'She studied journalism and psychology at Queensland University...' - what does this mean? Did she leave after a day, or does she have a psychology degree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.82.212 (talk) 21:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Unsourced claims
I've deleted a whole load of unsourced material as per WP:BLP: in addition to a lack of citations, most of the material I've removed is poorly written, bordering on the trivial and, from its tone, probably lifted from another source ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)