Talk:Tracey Emin

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tracey Emin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528131837/http://www.vam.ac.uk/activ_events/courses/lectures_talks_tours/friday_talks/index.html to http://www.vam.ac.uk/activ_events/courses/lectures_talks_tours/friday_talks/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151009232052/http://www.southlondongallery.org/page/144/Minky-Manky/208 to http://www.southlondongallery.org/page/144/Minky-Manky/208
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070524015201/http://www.labiennale.org/en/art/exhibition/en/73805.6.html to http://www.labiennale.org/en/art/exhibition/en/73805.6.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081210065415/http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2465953.0.Emin_gives_75_000_sculpture_as_thankyou_for_Scots_show.php to http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2465953.0.emin_gives_75_000_sculpture_as_thankyou_for_scots_show.php
 * Added tag to http://www.npg.org.uk/live/wotraceyemin.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151009232052/http://www.southlondongallery.org/page/144/Minky-Manky/208 to http://www.southlondongallery.org/page/144/Minky-Manky/208

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Missing key bio details
Odd that Emin's page is missing her full DOB (3rd July) and her middle name (Karima). These are not hard to find – they're available on her Britannica page here (article researched and written by their arts editor, Kathleen Kuiper, as credited at the top of the page). I was going to add this info myself but thought I'd ask why it's been removed first? Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 18:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Cleanup template
I have removed the following from the top of the article:

It is nearly five years old. There have been, Does anyone think it is still pertinent? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Good work. Absolutely not pertinent and the other ones should be removed as well. Whoever defaces articles with these boxes ought to either organise people to fix whatever they find objectionable, or it fix themselves or just not put the boxes there; instead of feeling like they've done 'stellar and important editing work' by generating an eyesore. I'm tired of seeing them.86.87.191.180 (talk) 18:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)