Talk:Tracy Lords

From Votes for deletion

 * for Gods sake, please! Wikipedia is read by children! Anjela 12:53, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Who reads WP is irrelevant, but this has no useful content and I think it is unlikely to ever acquire any. Lupo 13:17, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * useful for porn research. Keep. 141 13:25, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Adding more detail is the best way to get these kept - please do.:) Jamesday 13:33, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. It was created hours before being listed here and is clearly going to be expanded. Anjela, the Wikipedia does not have children as it's sole audience, though we do not (yet) have a system for filtering ccontent suitable for the varying views of what children of various ages in various countries and of various religious and social beliefs may see. If you'd like to try to work out how to implement such a system, please feel free to do so, since we clearly will need it eventually. Jamesday 13:33, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Such a system already exists. It's generally marketed under the brand names parent and/or guardian (in other words, it's a human problem, not a technological one). ShaneKing 14:46, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are plenty of porn movie review sites - Texture 14:07, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete; merge with Traci Lords unless this can be expanded because there is any significance to this movie. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:25, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Porn stubs can grow (see It's My Body, etc.) Keep. Meelar 16:56, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * The question is not whether it can grow, but should it. Copyright violations can grow... original works can grow... all sorts of things we don't want here could grow but are deleted because they are inappropriate.  It isn't like you can't get the "blow by blow" at another porno review site. - Texture 17:31, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insignificant. Sufficient to be listed in a List of porn films or like. Mikkalai 18:30, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is nonsense, she wasn't in a movie called &quot;Tracy Lords,&quot; she was just credited at that time under that spelling of her name. I suspect the rest of the articles 141 has created are also nonsense. Adam Bishop 20:16, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Actually, when this article was first created, I went to imdb to look to see if this movie actually existed, and it is listed there, so unless the listing at imdb is wrong, this is a real movie. RickK 20:25, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * You're right...sorry, I looked there too but I didn't see it the first time. Adam Bishop 20:33, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * We have to keep this article. The movie exists. A user created the article. To remind you, here are reasons you CANNOT delete an article: you don't like the content; children might see; people can find this info elsewhere. Kingturtle 23:58, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * There is nothing offending either in the title, or in the content. What is the problem ? fr0069
 * Delete. Hardly anything here, no reason why this half-sentence needs a separate page when it could easily be dealt with (and actually is dealt with) as a single line on Tracy Lords. Andre Engels 15:46, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unlike It's My Body, there is apparently nothing that makes this porno noteworthy.  Cool Hand Luke 06:22, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Noteworthiness is in the eye of the beholder. No need to delete this just because it isn't famous.  RickK 06:22, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, there's no need for something to be famous, but an article should at least state it has some context somewhere. Currently, it's a cast list with only one castmember listed.  No explaination of how it's notable or different or anything.  Because there is none, and because this one line is the what our author chose to write about the movie, I'm inclined to believe it is in fact not significant whatsoever.  Cool Hand Luke 08:06, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Anthony DiPierro 01:35, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge with some List of porn movies because we have so many articles and we lack organisation. I see no reason to delete. It seems this movie exists. Optim 01:55, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep and link Traci Lords to it. Do you realize that no-one will add some info to Tracy Lords stub unless you link it from the Traci Lords page? And why did you remove the link to It's My Body from that main Traci Lords page? How can people access It's My Body now? In fact, the information provided on those pages is extremely valuable as there are very few reviews of these old movies. Those movies were withdrawn from circulation and can't be obtained legally any more.