Talk:Tragelaphini

Assitance with article maintance and moving the page to Tragelaphini
I have created this article ten years ago when I was an ambitious middle schooler who wanted to add more depth into the various bovine tribes. Of course being as I was a kid, I was not fully mature and did not know how to properly write/cite articles for Wikipedia. Since then, I have done a lot more articles and have better understood how to do articles more properly according to the site's guidelines, as well as finally knowing how to do citations more properly. With that said I decided to go back to some articles that I have years ago to make them more comprehensive and in depth. I do appreciate some assistance as I would love to have this article to get at least a "B" rating.

I am also in the process of moving the page to Tragelaphini, given the fact most bovid systematists and biologists use it instead of Strepsicerotini. A simple Google search shows Tragelaphini getting more web results instead of Strepsicerotini (even though there is a strong case for Strepsiceros being a valid genus).--4444hhhh (talk) 16:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I promote conservatively but it definitely was not a Stub. Change it to a B by all means.PRehse (talk) 17:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Which I was not even aware that "stubs" were just a catch all term for bad articles. I was always under the assumption that it was just for short articles or lesser important one. It certainly is no longer a stub article now that is for sure. Thank you.--4444hhhh (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No stub was always for very short articles just that this article must have been evaluated only at it's early infancy. It is now a really nice piece of work.PRehse (talk) 17:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. If you have seen the original article, it was lacking of substance and I was surprised it was left like that for ten years. I have always been meaning to give the article for substance since this past year. Hopefully when Tragelaphini gets deleted, I can move the title. Worse comes to worse, I can always move it to something like "tragelaphs (biology)" or "spiral-horned antelopes" (which I am not a big fan of either one, but at least in maintains some stability in the attributes).--4444hhhh (talk) 17:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Two subsections that could be worthy for the article, but needs a lot of realible and valid sources.
There are two subsections I want to put in the Natural History and Relationships with Humans. For the former I would love to get into some depth about tragelaphin parasites. There is a lot of literature about them out there, but it to condense this into a generalization about the group as a whole is tricky. If anyone can direct me to such a source, or at least point to the direction of good papers on tragelaphin parasites that would be great. For the latter section I want to put in a subsection about them in culture (in particular African folklore and them as herald animals, etc.) BUT there does not seem to be a good source on this matter. If anyone can recommend me papers again, that would be spectacular.--4444hhhh (talk) 03:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Fellow Wikieditors, feel free to edit/revise!
While this article has gotten a lot better since its simple, humble beginnings ten years ago, I am sure there is still bound to be errors in terms of pacing, minor grammatical errors and keeping the article informal/easy to digest to read according to Wikipedia's guidelines. I have been doing as such as we speak but others are welcome to help give this a look over. Trying to get this article to be submitted a G.A.--4444hhhh (talk) 03:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree this is certainly worthy of a GA nomination.  Luso titan  04:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * How does one go about giving articles nominations? And can anyone do it?--4444hhhh (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)]]
 * Yes, anyone can do it. See WP:GAI.  Luso titan  05:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC)