Talk:Training to failure

Current research may contradict article
This page is really poorly supported by research. For example https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666744 states the complete opposite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.57.104.135 (talk) 11:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The article is poorly sourced, and would benefit from the academic research findings found here, here and here. 14.2.198.139 (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note that the paper you're citing: has an issued correction:  In it, the authors rewrite some statements to indicate there was no significant difference between failure and non-failure training. For example, in the abstract: "'Non-failure training resulted in a 0.6–1.3% greater strength increase than failure training.' (original)""'No significant strength increases were found for failure training versus non-failure training (ES = 0.05, p = 0.73)' (corrected)" That being said, I do agree the article could use with some more studies and clearer language. Cheers — Avelludo (Talk / Contribs / Log) 03:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Humanities
— Assignment last updated by Mtpride07 (talk) 23:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)