Talk:Tramlink route 1

A complete mess - needs a major sort out
This entire article is so very out-of-date as route 1 no longer goes to Wimbledon (hasn't for almost two years now). Everything about Croydon-Wimbledon needs to go into Route 3 - which is currently extremely short. Other stuff is also out of date e.g. Oyster fare. The history, while interesting, seems to be wandering well away from the subject in question.

Basically it needs a complete sort out as do the articles on route 2 (too colloquial), route 3 (the longest, busiest and most important route has virtually nothing about it) and route 4 (highly speculative).

I'll do it one day when I have the time but if someone else wants to make a start ...--Pedantic of Purley (talk) 22:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

two routes
Theres only two routes on the tramlink route map now, one green and one is light green so should route one and two be mereged. Likelife (talk) 12:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Redirect to the correct naming
The difference between namings is the way the name is said, for example Tramlink routes is the combined naming, whereas Tramlink Route 1 is the actual name of the single route and as a noun, all words should have capital letters. Nathan A RF (talk) 16:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Undo deletion - make redirect
As the nominator for deletion, I have found that the other route pages are now redirects to the main Tranlink article - would this be easier? The route itself has marginal claim for inclusion on WP...? IamMattDavies (talk) 10:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)