Talk:Trans fat/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Areas of concern

 * Breadth of coverage: The "history" and "nutritional guidelines" examples have been flagged for being too U.S.-centric.
 * Verification/citations: A number of links are dead, and there are citation needed tags elsewhere.
 * Timeliness: The topic drew more interest in 2006–2007, it would appear, based on the date much of the sources were retrieved. (Article was listed as GA in 2007.) The "major users' response" section has been marked as out-of-date.
 * -- Jprg1966  (talk)  20:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Update
I forgot all about this GAR until another user flagged it for me. Having seen no clear attempt to address the above concerns, I think it is appropriate at this stage to remove Good Article status. I will do so now. -- Jprg1966  (talk)  14:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)