Talk:Transarc

Untitled
> An editor has expressed a concern that the subject of the article does not satisfy the notability guideline

Untitled
Which suggests an editor is ignorant of computing history.

If the Andrew Project is worthy of an entry in Wikipedia, then Transarc, the commercial home of the Andrew Project (or, more specifically the Andrew File System) is worthy of discussion as well.

An argument could be made that the Transarc entry be merged with the Andrew Project article, or perhaps the OpenAFS article, but suggesting it just be deleted is shortsighted.

Bforte 22:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I strongly agree with Bforte and am removing the notability mark. AFS (and OpenAFS) are unquestionably notable, and Transarc was its steward for most of its life. Megacz 11:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)