Talk:Transcribing YHWH

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view

At the above link is found the text below:


 * The neutral point of view
 * The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting views. The policy requires that, where there are or have been conflicting views, these are fairly presented, but not asserted.


 * All significant points of view are presented, not just the most popular one. It is not asserted that the most popular view or some sort of intermediate view among the different views is the correct one. Readers are left to form their own opinions.


 * As the name suggests the neutral point of view is a point of view. It is a point of view that is neutral - that is neither sympathetic nor in opposition to its subject.


 * Debates are described, represented, and characterized, but not engaged in. Background is provided on who believes what and why, and which view is more popular.


 * Detailed articles might also contain the mutual evaluations of each viewpoint, but studiously refrain from stating which is better. One can think of unbiased writing as the cold, fair, analytical description of debates.


 * When bias towards one particular point of view can be detected the article needs to be fixed.

Seeker02421 21:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

This page is a content fork more likely A POV fork. Wighson would have you believe that "Jehovah" should not be but this article should be! Lets be consistent! wikipedia states, "content fork is usually an unintentional creation of several separate articles all treating the same subject. A POV fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines, often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts. In harmony with that this page should be directed to [tetragrammaton]  Johanneum 02:29, 2 April 2006 (UTC)