Talk:Transepted gallery grave

Merger proposal
I propose that Transepted gallery grave be merged into Gallery grave. There simply is not enough content in this article to justify its own article. I surveyed the literature, and it probably could not be improved much (even when fully cited and with more info added). Rather, "transepted gallery grave" could be easily be explained in the context of "gallery grave", which would provide much-needed context. "Gallery grave" is of a reasonable size that the merge will not cause the article size to swell or give undue weight. Tim1965 (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Agreed and ✅. See also Talk:Gallery grave Klbrain (talk) 17:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)