Talk:Transfer-appropriate processing/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Delldot (talk · contribs) 06:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Bro47024, welcome to Wikipedia, thanks for helping to improve the project. I see that you have not made any edits to this article, so I'm not going to give this an in-depth review now, because I'm not sure anyone's going to act on my suggestions. However if you're interested in continuing to work on and improve the article at any point, leave me a message on my talk page and I'll be glad to help in any way you need. I'm going to list some of the things that stood out on my first pass through the article: Again, thanks for your contributions to the project. I think this article has the potential to become really great, and I'm happy to help if editors are interested in making that happen, just let me know. delldot  &nabla;.  06:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Per WP:LEAD, the lead section needs to summarize the article. So far all we have is a definition.
 * The article lacks wikilinks to other article, it needs to be wikified.
 * Use non-technical terms and language that any layperson can understand. It will probably be a layperson with no previous understanding of the field who reads an encyclopedia article on it. (for example, explain what state-dependent memory is when the term is used, don't just link to its page).
 * Lacks images.
 * Every fact needs to be referenced to a reliable source. There are not enough references, and it is not clear if every fact in a paragraph with a reference at the end is indeed supported by that reference.
 * The article needs to be copy edited to comply with Wikipedia's Manual of Style.
 * The article needs to have a neutral point of view, so avoid terms like "great" or comments like "one of the leading psychologists" that might suggest the author is making commentary or supporting a particular viewpoint.
 * I'm concerned that the article is not comprehensive enough. This is a well known psychological phenomenon and I suspect a great deal more could be written about this than we have here.