Talk:Transit privatization

This article is weirdly biased towards a free market perspective. There is lots of evidence that in many area privatisation has been a negative for rail services. This should be discussed.

Very very poorly written. Needs to see improvement or should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.163.72 (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Ideological
This article has few facts and reads as a defense of transit privitization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.188.195.99 (talk) 10:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

This needs to be either re-written to be factual and balanced or deleted! Eric Doherty (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Agreed! I've added a tag to this effect Lucaswilkins (talk) 01:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

This article may indeed be a candidate for deletion. Although the topic matter may be relevant, there are hardly any tangible facts. The article reads like an opinion essay for school rather than an encyclopedia entry. I often suggest a re-write but this one must be done from scratch. --Arquenevis (talk) 18:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

If anybody reading this is anti-privatisation, please add to the article by writing about the problems privatisation has caused. I am pro-privatisation, but all viewpoints should be included.