Talk:Transport Direct

Rollback - October 2010
I have rolled the article back for a number of reasons.
 * The edits have removed important sourced content with no justification, for example costs.
 * The edits have confused TD itself, a division of the DfT, with the portal which it operates - the division and the portal are different and the Transport Direct Portal already has it's own article
 * Some of the new content read more like something from a corporate website that an encyclopedia

Having rolled the article back I have re-worked some of the new content back into the article. I have also left a note on the contributor's talk page. PeterEastern (talk) 04:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Declaration of interest
Hi, this is just to let fellow editors know that the company I am employed by, ITO World, sometimes does business with Transport Direct and the DfT. I hope that this will not colour my edits in any way, as I edit in good faith and hope to remain neutral in the matter.

I aim to bring less accessible knowledge of the organisation to the public, and clarify a few points. If you're worried about a lack of neutrality due to a possible conflict of interest, let me know or just clean up following my edits. EricITOworld (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)