Talk:Transport in Bristol

First
First city line covers bath too, would not work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark999 (talk • contribs)
 * Then just add the content about the content relevant to Bath into the apropriate article. There is not enough encyclopeadic content about First CityLine for an apropriate article. Thryduulf 22:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

First City Line DOES NOT cover Bath. This is First Somerset & Avon Jobie29 12:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Article change
Today i have cleared up the article, and have made sections for each individual mode of transport

Air travel, cycling, roads, public transport - bus-rail-water. and split Cureent probelms and future developments.

Hopefully this will help make bristol transport clearer and easier to look at. Mark999 15:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Uhuh, and I've reverted it. Previously, it had a well thought through structure, rather than the relatively arbitrary grouping that it became.  Clearer and easier to look at?  Nonsense.  The change disrupted a considered flow, and hid the important bits under relatively trivial parts that were given undue eight.  The fact that the inner city ring-road shares arbitrary properties with the M4 is not a good reason to lump them together.  And the article is much easier to follow when the Megabus to London is alongide the Intercity train, rather than the number 70 to Filton, with which it shares only trivial properties.  Joe D (t) 19:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Bus Rapid Transit
The BRT plans are now up online courtesty of Freedom of Information requests: []. I think this would merit coverage. I also think some of the controversy surrounding the South Bristol Ring Road and the proposed BRT route ought to be looked at. SteveLoughran (talk) 00:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Hansard 02 August 1972
I just found Traffic Congestion, Bristol, which documents a discussion involving Keith Speed, Michael Cocks, Jerry Wiggin and Robert Cooke (politician). I think it could be of use here. -- Trevj (talk) 12:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Transport in Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140724182420/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/environment/greener_living/transport/Overall%20Commuter%20Count%20Results%202013.pdf to http://www.bristol.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/environment/greener_living/transport/Overall%20Commuter%20Count%20Results%202013.pdf
 * Added tag to http://www.uwesu.net/documentssite/yourvoice/agmagenda06.doc
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060524221325/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/282/DC/sus_2.pdf to http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/282/DC/sus_2.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070413000653/http://www.gbsts.com/ to http://www.gbsts.com/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060628211541/http://www.greaterbristoltransportplan.org/ltp_pdf/maindoc/ltp-main-section-6.pdf to http://www.greaterbristoltransportplan.org/ltp_pdf/maindoc/ltp-main-section-6.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081211110418/http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/general-content/citiesandregions/impacturban/ to http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/general-content/citiesandregions/impacturban/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090921135310/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/transport-policy/big-commuter-count-2008.en to http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/transport-policy/big-commuter-count-2008.en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)