Talk:Travis Price

Untitled
The dispute involves an nn tag that the original author apparently considers an affront to his work. See User talk:Nynewart and my talk page as well as the edit history. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The dispute actually involves Realkyhick's civility and Realkyhick's not letting an objective third party resolve the issue by getting other editors known to Realychick (Orangemike) to delete my request on the 3rd party review page, while making erroneous edits on the Price page (the citations were not to Price's own site but to a respected DC architecture review blog that is actually critical of Price).Nynewart (talk) 21:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Third opinion: I already left a message on User talk:Nynewart, but I'll speak up here as well. No one can give a third opinion on a subject unless we know what the problem is. I see no discussion here aside from the question of the non-notability tag. I believe that the notability tag should be left on this page until someone proves otherwise. I see no reliable sources or any such, and a handful of blog posts doesn't make someone notable. I'm fairly sure this article currently fails WP:BLP, so it needs to be heavily improved. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:48, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * thank you for your review, HelloAnnyong.


 * The reason why there isn't discussion on the Price page is because the editor in question (Realkyhick) started making comments on my username page and I felt it best to keep the discussion where it started. I am not calling into question orangemike's credibility, but if you look at the bottom of his talk page User talk:Orangemike, you will see (Realkyhick), the editor in question, asking orange to review it.  Shortly after wards, orange deleted my 3rd party request and made an edit on the price page giving an incorrect reason for it. This did not smell like an objective 3rd party review to me and in fact was more like "teaming up"/meat puppetry. I am just trying to make a decent article on a household name in architecture and noted in the creation tag less than 48 hours ago it was going to be expanded upon. I had 3 citations which were removed erroneously and noted that more would be coming. Frankly I will leave the page to others to sort out now that it has become such a mess and most of the content was deleted before I could cite it (it was christmas yesterday, ya know?). I've lost a lot of respect for this site in this process-- Nynewart (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

SOURCES

Nynewart, http://dcmetrocentric.com/2008/12/19/travis-prices-new-falling-water/ is an unacceptable source per WP:SPS on the grounds that it is a blog, and therefore is a self-published source that is not easily verified. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * it is best that the quotes be taken out then as that is where they came from originally. I thought the citation was removed before by Mike saying it was a link to Price's own site which is not the case.--Nynewart (talk) 23:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest edits
Seems the article was edited by a, but his edits weren't substantial enough to warrant a COI tag IMO. I've left a message on his talk page to see if I can get some kind of verification. -- &oelig; &trade; 05:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)