Talk:Treaties of Rome (1941)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 15:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'll be happy to do this review. Back soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Basic GA criteria

 * 1) GACR#1a. Well written: the prose is clear, concise and understandable.
 * 2) GACR#1a. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
 * 3) GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
 * 4) GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
 * 5) GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
 * 6) GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for linking.
 * 7) GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
 * 8) GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable
 * 9) GACR#2a. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
 * 10) GACR#2b. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
 * 11) GACR#2b. All inline citations are from reliable sources.
 * 12) GACR#2b. All quotations are cited and their usage complies with MOS guidelines.
 * 13) GACR#2c. No original research.
 * 14) GACR#2d. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
 * 15) GACR#3. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
 * 16) GACR#4. Neutral (NPOV).
 * 17) GACR#5. Stable.
 * 18) GACR#6a. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.
 * 19) GACR#6b. Images are relevant to the topic with appropriate captions.

I'll be using this list to complete the review. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

I've read this twice now and what can I say except that it is an excellent piece of work. It could of course be expanded and you could make tweaks in order to fine-tune it but it ticks all of the boxes above (except the two that are inapplicable) and I'm promoting it to GA without further ado. I like the images and the layout, but most of all it is a very interesting narrative from which I've learned quite a lot. Congratulations. All the best and stay safe. No Great Shaker (talk) 11:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking time to review this article. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk) 12:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)