Talk:Treaty Clause

Full text
Did somebody miss the meaning of what "full text" means? You shouldn't truncate it with an elipsis. Seriously, who did that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.64.72.150 (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I totally agree. Please, someone who understands the concept of "full text", insert the full text where it belongs in the article.Daqu (talk) 02:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Explain what you are talking about before explaining other things about it!!!
The section titled One of three types of international accord begins as follows:

"In the United States, the term "treaty" is used in a more restricted legal sense than in international law. U.S. law distinguishes what it calls treaties from congressional-executive agreements and sole-executive agreements.[1] All three classes are considered treaties under international law; they are distinct only from the perspective of internal United States law. Distinctions among the three concern their method of ratification: by two-thirds of the Senate, by normal legislative process, or by the President alone, respectively. The Treaty Clause . . ."

Okay, you've mentioned the names three types of treaties as seen by U.S. law" treaties, congressional-executive agreements and sole-executive agreements.

Now before going on to tell us more about them, tell us what these names mean . Then readers will be able to understand what you are talking about when you expound upon them further.Daqu (talk) 03:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action This directly violates this Treaty Clause.Easeltine (talk) 16:48, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Alias cs Alias cs (talk) 00:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)