Talk:Treaty of Casco (1678)

deleting 2013 "cleanup" tag
deleted 2013 "cleanup" marking. The language certainly doesn't seem unencyclopedic to me. It doesn't appear that there have been any extensive changes since 2014, I'm going to "be bold" as Wikipedians of the past were instructed and take it down. I'm also not going to sign, and get into another edit war. If you feel sufficiently motivated to reverse my decision, go ahead, I don't care so much as to get into another ugly confrontation, which is about all I ever have got over fifteen years of editing.

Frankly I'm also tempted to get rid of the "sections" and combine everything into a single section, because there is so little documentary evidence that exists, not even the treaty itself, there's not likely to be significant future contributions (arbitrarily I'd say nothing over 5000 bytes, as everything since 2009 is well under that limit).

Proposal to merge with Treaty of Casco (1703)
Following my previous post mentioning lack of enough content for sections, I've looked up the 1703 Treaty of Casco, which is "structured" this way, and merger of the two articles seems wise.