Talk:Treaty of Ciudad Juárez/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ɳorɑfʈ  Talk! 14:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC) Links check out. Article looks good. I did a bit of copyediting. Will go over it a little more carefully in a second pass, and if everything checks out, should be able to promote it. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I added a tag. If you can put a citation there, we'll be ready to promote. Nice article.  ɳorɑfʈ  Talk! 14:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I must have overlooked it. The info is also in the sources already in the article. I added the relevant inline citations.radek (talk) 10:13, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 12:56, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: