Talk:Treaty of Greenville (1814)

Normal copyediting restricted
Because this article purports to be quoting an historical document, for almost its entirety, I have not altered text that might be considered badly punctuated or spelled. I am following the convention of letting quotes stand—errors and all. These errors are only errors by the conventions of 2012, not perhaps by the conventions of 1814. --Greenmaven (talk) 23:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

more work needed
I'm not in favor of including entire treaty documents word-for-word in wikipedia articles. I think they belong in wikimedia instead. I haven't corrected the odd spellings, but added a background section. I personally think this article should be combined with that of the other Treaty of Greenville, or at least wikilinks made between the native signatories' names.Jweaver28 (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Entire article is irrelevant
Nearly everything in this article is irrelevant. The article should be about the treaty, not the text of, signers of, or background of the treaty. The article is a shambles. Sbalfour (talk) 08:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)