Talk:Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye (1919)

Untitled
The Peace Treaty with Austria, signed on 10 September 1919. It was signed at St. Germain Palace in Paris. The treaty entered into effect on 16 July 1920.

''The above was the content of the duplicate page.  18:14, 1 May 2004 (UTC)''

disambiguation
The links to this page: ought to be changed to Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye (disambiguation), but without an automated process to change the links to those redirects, it is a lot of work. So I have changed them to link to this page and will leave the task to someone who has a bot and can do it easily to change all the links to point at this page before changing the redirects. --Philip Baird Shearer 12:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Treaty of Saint-Germain (redirect page)
 * Treaty of St. Germain (redirect page)
 * Treaty of Saint Germain (redirect page)

Recent addition, reverted
I removed last addition but not the German-speaking Sudetenland, because this is not an article about what was not done. Sudetenland was not only german-speaking, so the claim itself is invalid.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 15:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Rv of your rv. This article is about what was done to Austria by the treaty. The German-speaking Sudetenland was given to CS. -- Matthead DisOuß   22:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It was part of Bohemia for centuries.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 22:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Bohemia is nothing more than the name of a region. The Sudetenland had been part of Austria for Centuries and it was indeed almost entirely German speaking (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Germans_in_western_Austro-Hungaria.gif). Please stop your nationalistic motivated omitting of facts.

Deleted Infobox
I deleted the infobox because the maps were irrelevant (showing only German losses). However, it would be a good idea if someone created an infobox for this article. Ryoung 122 12:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

The United States - A Signatory?
Did the United States sign it or not? The article can't seem to decide ——67.180.86.254 (talk) 03:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the article is clear that the US signed but did not ratified the treaty. Those are distinct steps. --McSly (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Conditions
I think the condition of this treaty in Line By Line structure will be better.Ovsek (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

irredentists
"In addition the negotiators on the Allied side, particularly Wilson, did not understand when speaking of self-determination that no convenient line could be drawn to separate intermingled nationalities, and that in further cases, irredentists would claim that some German or Hungarian-speaking territories had actually been theirs."

Is this a personal opinion of someone or is it really known "that the negotiators on the Allied side" and Wilson did not understand?