Talk:Treaty of Stettin (1630)

comments
nice article. Well cited, relatively clear, but needs some additional editing for the sake of clarity. For example, in the lead, a reference to "imperial" troops could have mean Swedish troops, but actually meant HRE troops. I've tweaked the lead somewhat, but the rest needs an edit from a good copy editor, or else the original author needs to go back after a short time. No reason why this couldn't be GA with only a little more effort.It would also help to have an additional map that is "simplified" and in English. Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Overlinking
This is one of the most phenomenally overlinked articles I've ever seen. I wonder if anyone responsible for adding some of the many redundant links—including the multiple repetitions of Old Style and New Style dates—would care to defend the linking, before I embark on a long-overdue cull? Harfarhs (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)